Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-08-08 | 2020-02-11 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Atlantis blue, Matrix purple and Phoenix red |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 444 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 has a general score of 81.2, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Poco X2's 79.3 overall score. The Motorola Edge 50 design is noticeably newer, somewhat lighter and thinner than the Xiaomi Poco X2. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 50 has newer 14 version while Xiaomi Poco X2 has Android 11, so it gives you lots of additional features and a performance increase.
The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a much better looking screen than Xiaomi Poco X2, and although they both have a same size display, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a bit higher resolution of 1220 x 2712 and a bit higher count of pixels in each inch in the display. Motorola Edge 50 has a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Poco X2, because it has more internal memory.
Xiaomi Poco X2 counts with a much better performance than Motorola Edge 50, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Xiaomi Poco X2 features a bit better camera than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor taking less light and duller colors and a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Poco X2 also counts with a way more MP back-facing camera.
Motorola Edge 50 features just a little better battery life than Xiaomi Poco X2, because it has an 11% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.