Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-08-08 | 2021-03-24 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray |
| Aluminum | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has an overall score of 82.4, which is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 50's 81.2 score. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has older 11 version while Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14 version. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is a older, just a little bit heavier and just a little thicker phone than Motorola Edge 50.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a brighter display, a quite better screen pixels density and a quite better resolution of 1220 x 2712 pixels.
Motorola Edge 50 has a quite bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low light photography and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a battery performance that's just as good as the battery lifetime in Motorola Edge 50, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has a 0 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.