Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-08-08 | -- |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | -- |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a global score of 86.1, which is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50's global score of 81.2. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro's body is somewhat heavier and just a bit thicker than Motorola Edge 50. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has the previous 11 version while Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14 version.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Motorola Edge 50 features a much better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, although it has a little bit lower pixels number per inch of screen and a quite lower resolution of 1220 x 2712px, they both have a screen of the same size.
Motorola Edge 50 counts with a lot bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro takes slightly better photographs and videos than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for shooting photographs in low-light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also counts with a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has just a little better battery duration than Motorola Edge 50, because it has a 3 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.