Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-08-08 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 444 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, getting a general score of 81.2 against 76.6. These phones use Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 has a more recent 14 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has Android 10 version, so it counts with some extra features and improved performance. The Motorola Edge 50 is a much newer phone, and it's also just a bit lighter and somewhat thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9.
Motorola Edge 50 features a sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because it has a little bit higher resolution of 1220 x 2712 pixels, a bit bigger screen and a little more pixels per inch in the display. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Motorola Edge 50 counts with much more storage to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Motorola Edge 50 has a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have the same aperture, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a way larger sensor, a lot better video resolution and a more mega-pixels back camera.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9's battery performance is very similar to the Motorola Edge 50 one, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also has a 5020mAh battery capacity against 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.