Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-08-08 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 444 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, having an 81.2 score against 81.1. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 has a newer 14 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has Android 10 version, so it gives you some additional features and some performance improvements. Motorola Edge 50 is a way newer cellphone, and it is also somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a much faster processor than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Motorola Edge 50 has a better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a bit higher resolution of 1220 x 2712 pixels and a quite better quantity of pixels per inch in the screen.
Motorola Edge 50 features a quite bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a bit better camera than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has a tinier aperture and a smaller camera sensor giving a worse image quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a camera with way more megapixels.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro and Motorola Edge 50 both count with similar batteries, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a 5020mAh battery capacity against 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.