Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-08-08 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 444 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, with a global score of 81.2 against 79. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 has a newer 14 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has Android 11 version, so it provides the user a lot of extra features. Motorola Edge 50 is a much newer phone, and it's also somewhat thinner and lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a much faster processor than Motorola Edge 50, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Motorola Edge 50 has a brighter screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a bit better screen density and a bit higher 1220 x 2712 pixels resolution.
Motorola Edge 50 captures slightly better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have the same video resolution, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a much bigger back camera sensor providing a lot better image quality and a higher resolution back facing camera.
Motorola Edge 50 features a greater memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S and Motorola Edge 50 both feature quite similar batteries duration, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also has a 0% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.