Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 15 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2025-04-24 | 2019-05-10 |
| -- | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| -- | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| -- | 537 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is better than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, having an 83.7 score against 73.4. Both phones we are comparing here come with Android operating system, but LG V50 ThinQ has an older 10 version while Motorola Edge 60 Pro has Android 15. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much faster processing unit than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a much better screen than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a quite smaller screen. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro takes better videos and photos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for shooting pictures and video in low light environments and lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro also counts with a way larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back facing camera with a way better resolution.
LG V50 ThinQ has a much bigger memory for games and applications than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola Edge 60 Pro has a superior battery performance than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.