Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 15 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2014-10-28 |
| -- | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Black and Blue |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| -- | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| -- | 565 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 5.5 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.52 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo is slightly better than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, having a general score of 77.9 against 73.4. Both phones we are comparing have Android OS, but the Motorola DROID Turbo has a more recent 4.4.4 version and Motorola Edge 60 Pro has Android 15. The Motorola DROID Turbo features a much more vibrant display than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a way smaller screen.
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a very superior processor than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, because although it has 4 less cpu cores and 5 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a graphics co-processor. Motorola Edge 60 Pro counts with a better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro also has faster 30 frames per second video frame rates, a back facing camera with lot more MP and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light captures and videos.
The Motorola Edge 60 Pro counts with a very superior storage for apps and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Motorola Edge 60 Pro features a way better battery duration than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3900mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.