Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android |
| 2025-04-24 | 2021-01-22 |
| -- | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| -- | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | TFT |
| -- | 270 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 has a general score of 84.7, which is much better than Motorola Edge 60 Pro's global score of 73.4. The Galaxy A32 counts with Android operating system, while Motorola Edge 60 Pro comes with Android 15 operating system. The Galaxy A32 has a much more vibrant display than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a little bit smaller display.
The Galaxy A32 counts with a very superior processing unit than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro has a little bit more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
Motorola Edge 60 Pro features improved battery duration than Galaxy A32, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 5000mAh. Motorola Edge 60 Pro takes clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a same size camera aperture, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro also has a more megapixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.