Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-24 | 2018-10-20 |
| -- | 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| -- | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 411 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.52 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A7 (2018) has a general score of 84.2, which is much better than the Motorola Edge 60 Pro's 73.4 score. Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) has a way better display than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a little smaller display. The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) features a much better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) has just a bit bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola Edge 60 Pro takes much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for taking photographs and video in low-light environments, it also counts with a lot higher resolution back camera, a lot better video resolution and a way bigger sensor providing a lot better image quality.
Motorola Edge 60 Pro has a really longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.