Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2020-06-19 |
| -- | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| -- | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is a lot better than the Motorola Edge 60 Pro, having a score of 91.8 against 73.4. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has 11 version while Motorola Edge 60 Pro has Android 15. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features an incredibly better display than Motorola Edge 60 Pro. They have a same size display.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a much more powerful processor than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy A71 5G has a little bit better camera than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor capturing lower quality photos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, a F1.8 aperture and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with a much higher resolution.
Galaxy A71 5G features a greater storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds up to 1000 GB. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro counts with better battery performance than Galaxy A71 5G, because it has a 33 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.