Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-24 | 2019-05-29 |
| -- | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.52 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A80 is much better than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, with a score of 84.9 against 73.4. The Galaxy A80 features an incredibly better looking display than Motorola Edge 60 Pro. Both of them have a display of the same size. The Galaxy A80 features a lot better processing power than Motorola Edge 60 Pro. Both of them have 8 processing cores and 8 GB of RAM memory.
The Motorola Edge 60 Pro counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy A80, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro also has a larger aperture to capture better photos and videos in low-light environments, a back camera with more MP and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which provides a way higher photo and video quality.
Motorola Edge 60 Pro features a lot bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 60 Pro has a superior battery performance than Galaxy A80, because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.