Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2025-04-24 | 2017-02-24 |
| -- | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Black and Gold |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 367 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is better than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, having a global score of 81 against 73.4. Both devices in this review include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has 6.0 Marshmallow version and Motorola Edge 60 Pro has Android 15. Galaxy C9 Pro features a much better performing processing unit than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has an incredibly better display than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a quite smaller display. Motorola Edge 60 Pro counts with much more storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Motorola Edge 60 Pro counts with a greater camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a larger aperture to capture better low light photography and video, a camera in the back with a lot better 50 MP resolution and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality. Motorola Edge 60 Pro counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.