Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 86.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2020-03-05 |
| -- | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| -- | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 403 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.52 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M31 has a global score of 86.5, which is better than the Motorola Edge 60 Pro's 73.4 overall score. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy M31 has older 11 version and Motorola Edge 60 Pro has Android 15 version. Galaxy M31 features a much better performance than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy M31 features a much sharper display than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a little bit smaller screen and much worse brightness. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro has a quite bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy M31, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
Galaxy M31 captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor which gives a worse image and video quality, and they both have a same size camera aperture, the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy M31 also counts with a camera in the back with a way better 64 MP resolution.
Galaxy M31 features a battery performance that is very similar to Motorola Edge 60 Pro's battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.