Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-24 | 2018-08-24 |
| -- | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| -- | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 514 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note9 has a general score of 87.1, which is much better than the Motorola Edge 60 Pro's score of 73.4. Galaxy Note9 features a much better display than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a little bit smaller display. Galaxy Note9 has a way better performance than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a bit more storage to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 512 GB. Motorola Edge 60 Pro counts with a much better camera than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light photography and videos and worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro also counts with a lot higher 50 MP resolution back-facing camera and a lot larger sensor taking lot better quality photos and videos.
Motorola Edge 60 Pro features a really longer battery performance than Galaxy Note9, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.