Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 5.1 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2015-08-13 |
| -- | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Black, Gold and Gray |
| -- | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| -- | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 515 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 5.5 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 7.52 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, with a 79.3 score against 73.4. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has the previous 5.1 version while Motorola Edge 60 Pro has Android 15. The Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a much better display than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has a bit smaller display.
The Galaxy S6 edge+ has a much better performance than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, although it has less RAM memory and an inferior number of cores (although they are faster). The Motorola Edge 60 Pro shoots better photos and videos than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro also has a bigger aperture, a way bigger sensor and a way more megapixels back-facing camera.
The Motorola Edge 60 Pro has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 60 Pro counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.