Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| Android 15 | Android 14 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2024-04-03 |
| -- | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Dazzling Blue?, Pantone (Shadow and Sparkling Grape) | Black and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| -- | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| -- | 414 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme SM7550-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali G615-MC6 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 6.21 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Si - Carbon Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 7.52 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 60 Pro, getting a general score of 77.8 against 73.4. These phones include Android operating system, but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has the previous 14 version and Motorola Edge 60 Pro has Android 15. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way better screen than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, and although they both have the same display brightness, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a bigger display.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a little better performance than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has 8 GB more RAM. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a little bit better camera than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, and although they both have the same resolution back facing camera, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a larger camera aperture for better low-light images and video, a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution and a larger camera sensor.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 60 Pro, because it has 256 GB more internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 60 Pro has a bit longer battery performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 5700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.