Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.5 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2020-06-19 |
| -- | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Pantone (Gibraltar sea, Plum perfect) and Shamrock | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| -- | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is way better than the Motorola Edge 60, getting a 91.8 score against 72.5. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has older 11 version and Motorola Edge 60 has Android 15. The Galaxy A71 5G has a very superior processor than Motorola Edge 60, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a way better display than Motorola Edge 60. Both have a same size display. Galaxy A71 5G has a slightly better camera than Motorola Edge 60, because although it has a tinier sensor which gives a lower image and video quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the same aperture and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels.
Galaxy A71 5G has a quite bigger memory for games and applications than Motorola Edge 60, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits up to 1000 GB. Motorola Edge 60 has longer battery life than Galaxy A71 5G, because it has a 16 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.