Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.5 | 88 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2025-04-24 | 2020-08-06 |
| -- | 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Pantone (Gibraltar sea, Plum perfect) and Shamrock | Mirage black and Mirage blue |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 405 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.96 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M31s is much better than Motorola Edge 60, having a global score of 88 against 72.5. Both phones in this comparison review include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy M31s has older 11 version and Motorola Edge 60 has Android 15 version. Samsung Galaxy M31s counts with a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Edge 60, although it has a bit smaller screen.
Galaxy M31s counts with a little bit better storage for games and applications than Motorola Edge 60, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy M31s counts with a way better performance than Motorola Edge 60, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Galaxy M31s counts with just a little better battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 60, because it has a 6000mAh battery size. Galaxy M31s counts with a slightly better camera than Motorola Edge 60, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor providing a lower image quality, and they both have the same diafragm aperture, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy M31s also counts with a back facing camera with much more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.