Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.5 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-24 | 2018-08-24 |
| -- | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Pantone (Gibraltar sea, Plum perfect) and Shamrock | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| -- | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 514 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note9 has a general score of 87.1, which is way better than the Motorola Edge 60's 72.5 score. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 60, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. The Galaxy Note9 features a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Edge 60, although it has a bit smaller screen.
The Galaxy Note9 counts with slightly more memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 60, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola Edge 60 counts with greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because it has a 30 percent larger battery capacity.
The Motorola Edge 60 features a better camera than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light photos and videos and lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same video quality, the Motorola Edge 60 also counts with a back camera with a lot better 50 megapixels resolution and a lot bigger sensor shooting way better quality photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.