Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.5 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 15 | -- |
| 2025-04-24 | 2018-08-29 |
| -- | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Pantone (Gibraltar sea, Plum perfect) and Shamrock | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| -- | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| -- | 402 pixels per inch |
| 4500 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.5 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is better than the Motorola Edge 60, having an 85.5 score against 72.5. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a way better looking screen than Motorola Edge 60, although it has a lot darker display and a bit smaller screen. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a very superior CPU than Motorola Edge 60. Both of them have 8 GB of RAM and 8 CPU cores.
The Motorola Edge 60 takes much better photos and videos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 60 also counts with a larger diafragm aperture, a back camera with a lot better 50 megapixels resolution and a lot larger sensor.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola Edge 60, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has an external memory slot that holds up to 256 GB. Motorola Edge 60 has longer battery duration than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has 5200mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.