Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.6 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Midnight magenta and Solar black | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 544.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.58 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola edge has a score of 89.6, which is better than the Motorola Droid Turbo's 76.4 overall score. Both devices in our current comparison include Android operating system, but the Motorola edge has older 10 version and Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4. Motorola edge's body is notably newer and somewhat thinner than the Motorola Droid Turbo's, but it is a bit heavier.
The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a lot better looking display than Motorola edge, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and more pixels per inch of display. Motorola edge has much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1000 GB.
The Motorola Droid Turbo has a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola edge, because although it has an inferior number of cores and 3 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a graphics processor. The Motorola edge captures a lot better pictures and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola edge also has faster 30 fps video frame rates, a much better 64 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back and a bigger aperture.
The Motorola edge features a little better battery life than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 15 percent bigger battery size.
Although Motorola edge is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Droid Turbo. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Motorola edge, else you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola Droid Turbo, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.