Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.6 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Midnight magenta and Solar black | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 544.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.58 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola edge is much better than the Motorola DROID Turbo, having an 89.6 score against 77.9. Both of these devices come with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola edge has the older 10 version while Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4. Motorola edge's design is incredibly newer and somewhat thinner than Motorola DROID Turbo's, but it's a little bit heavier.
Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a little better processing power than Motorola edge, because although it has 3 GB less RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit. The Motorola DROID Turbo has a much better display than Motorola edge, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a higher count of pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels.
Motorola edge shoots much better videos and photos than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola edge also has faster video frame rates, a lot better resolution back camera and a larger aperture to take better low light captures. Motorola edge counts with a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 256 GB internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Motorola edge features a bit longer battery performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Motorola edge is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola DROID Turbo. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy Motorola DROID Turbo, letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.