Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.6 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2020-12-21 |
| 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches | 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Midnight magenta and Solar black | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 544.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 18.58 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola edge is better than the Galaxy A12, having a score of 89.6 against 80.3. Motorola edge's body is just a little thicker but just a little bit lighter than the Galaxy A12, and both of them were released only a couple months apart. Both devices in this comparison work with the same Android 10 OS, so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding operating system features.
Motorola edge counts with a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy A12, because it has a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px, more pixels per screen inch and a little larger screen. Motorola edge features a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A12, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola edge also has a greater amount of RAM.
Motorola edge has a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A12, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Galaxy A12 features a bit superior battery life than Motorola edge, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Motorola edge captures much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A12, because it has a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera, a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a bigger aperture for better photos and videos in low-light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.