Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.6 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android |
| 2020-05-14 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Midnight magenta and Solar black | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 544.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | TFT |
| 385 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 18.58 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola edge is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A32, having an 89.6 score against 84.7. Motorola edge counts with Android 10 operating system, while Samsung Galaxy A32 works with Android operating system. Motorola edge's construction is a little bit lighter but just a bit thicker than Samsung Galaxy A32, and both of them were only released with a few months difference.
Motorola edge counts with just a bit better performance than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Motorola edge also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Motorola edge counts with a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because it has a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px, a higher count of pixels per inch in the screen and a little bigger display.
Motorola edge has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same aperture, the Motorola edge also has a way higher 64 mega pixels resolution camera in the back. The Motorola edge features a very superior storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 features just a little bit longer battery duration than Motorola edge, because it has an 11% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.