Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-05-14 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Midnight magenta and Solar black | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 544.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.58 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola edge has a score of 89.6, which is better than Galaxy C9 Pro's score of 81. Motorola edge is a a lot thicker phone than Galaxy C9 Pro, but both of them weight 6.63oz. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android operating system, but the Motorola edge has older 10 version and Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
The Motorola edge counts with just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy C9 Pro. They have 6 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores. The Motorola edge has a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a bit bigger screen, a quite greater screen pixel density and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
The Motorola edge has a lot better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a bigger aperture and a much more megapixels back camera. The Motorola edge features a much greater memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has more internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Motorola edge features a little better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.