Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.6 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-05-14 | -- |
| 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | -- |
| Midnight magenta and Solar black | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 544.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3080 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 500 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.58 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 69.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola edge is slightly better than the Galaxy S23 Ultra, with a score of 89.6 against 81.5. Both phones in this comparison review have Android operating system, but Motorola edge has an older 10 version while Galaxy S23 Ultra has Android 13 version. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra features a screen that is just as good as the display in Motorola edge, although the Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra also has a quite larger screen, a better resolution of 1440 x 3080px and a higher display pixels density.
Motorola edge counts with a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB and more internal storage capacity. The Motorola edge counts with a lot better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy S23 Ultra shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Motorola edge, because it has a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light photography and videos, a much bigger sensor shooting much higher quality pictures and a way more megapixels camera. The Galaxy S23 Ultra counts with just a little better battery lifetime than Motorola edge, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.