Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.6 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Midnight magenta and Solar black | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 544.00 | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.58 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola edge has an overall score of 89.6, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+'s 79.3 overall score. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but the Motorola edge has a more recent 10 version while Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has Android 5.1 version, giving some nice extra features and performance optimizations. Motorola edge's body is notably newer than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+'s, although it is heavier and notably thicker.
Galaxy S6 edge+ features a more vivid screen than Motorola edge, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440px resolution and a greater pixels amount per screen inch. Motorola edge has a superior memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1000 GB and more internal memory.
The Motorola edge features a better processor than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has more RAM and more cores. Motorola edge captures way better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola edge also has a much bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot higher quality photographs and videos, a back facing camera with a way better 64 megapixels resolution and a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light images and video.
Motorola edge has a much better battery life than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 50% more battery size.
The Motorola edge is more expensive than Galaxy S6 edge+, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.