Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Midnight magenta and Solar black | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 544.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.58 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola edge has an overall score of 89.6, which is better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 score. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but Motorola edge has older 10 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14. Although the Motorola edge is older and incredibly thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's body is still somewhat lighter.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with an incredibly better screen than Motorola edge, because it has a larger screen, a lot higher 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution and a quite greater pixels density. Motorola edge features a way better performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures just a bit better photos and videos than Motorola edge, because although it has a much less megapixels back facing camera, it also counts with a way larger back camera sensor taking way better quality videos and photographs, a much higher 7680x4320 video definition and a bigger camera aperture.
The Motorola edge counts with a little bit better memory to store more apps and games than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has only 256 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with superior battery life than Motorola edge, because it has a 5700mAh battery size.
In addition to being the best phone in our current comparison, Motorola edge is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.