Search


Compare phones

Global Score
36.171.5
Basic Information
MotorolaSamsung
--Android 4.0
--0000-00-00
4.21 x 2.28 x 0.48 inches5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches
2.79 ounces4.72 ounces
BlackBlack, Blue, Brown and White
--Plastic
--Scratch-Resistant Glass
$ 100.00$ 100.00
Display / Screen
3.2 inches4.8 inches
240 x 400 pixels 720 x 1280 pixels (HD)
LCDSuper AMOLED
146 pixels per inch306 pixels per inch
YesCapacitive, Multi-touch
5.88.2
Performance
--Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset
processorKrait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor
--2 GB (500 MHz) RAM
GPUAdreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU
5.768.46
Storage
--32 GB internal memory
microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot
1.327.56
Camera
3.00 MP8.00 MP + 1.90 MP
--f/2.60 aperture
--0.33 inches (1/3") sensor
--1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution
5.068.47
Networks
--Wi-Fi
--Mobile Hotspot
EDGE and GSMLTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA
SIMMicro SIM
0.35.6
Battery Life
910mAh Li-Ion Battery2100mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
--Wireless Charging
250 hours standby time
3.3 hours talk time
200 hours standby time
15 hours talk time
2.44
Other Features
BluetoothBluetooth 4.0
--GPS
--NFC
AccelerometerAccelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor
FM Radio--

Comparison review

Galaxy S III Cricket has a score of 71.5, which is way better than the Motorola EX124G's 36.1 overall score. The Galaxy S III Cricket is a notably thinner but notably heavier cellphone than Motorola EX124G. Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket features a very superior processing unit than Motorola EX124G, because it has an extra graphics processing unit and a greater number of cores.

Galaxy S III Cricket counts with a much more vibrant display than Motorola EX124G, because it has a lot more pixels per inch in the display, a way better resolution of 1280 x 720 and a lot larger screen. Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket counts with a way bigger storage to install applications and games than Motorola EX124G, because it has a SD extension slot that supports up to 64 GB.

Galaxy S III Cricket has a way better camera than Motorola EX124G, because it has a way more mega pixels camera. Galaxy S III Cricket counts with a really longer battery duration than Motorola EX124G, because it has 2100mAh of battery capacity against 910mAh.

The Galaxy S III Cricket costs the same than Motorola EX124G, making it a simple decision.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.