Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 47.2 | 62.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 2.2, 2.1 | Android 10 |
| 2010-10-05 | 2020-10-19 |
| 4.31 x 2.26 x 0.59 inches | 5.93 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| -- | Blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 90.00 | $ 89.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 1440 x 720 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 186 pixels per inch | 293 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| TI OMAP3410 chipset | MediaTek Helio A22 MT6761 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A8 (Single-Core 720 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Quad-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX530 (200 MHz) GPU | PowerVR GE8300 GPU |
| 7.2 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 1.32 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 3.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 5.06 | 7.48 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1540mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 288 hours standby time 7.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 2 V Tella is much better than Motorola Flipside, getting a score of 62.1 against 47.2. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the Nokia 2 V Tella has the newer 10 version and Motorola Flipside has Android 2.2 version. Even though Nokia 2 V Tella is somewhat heavier than Motorola Flipside, it's way thinner and also a lot newer.
The Nokia 2 V Tella has a very superior processor than Motorola Flipside, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with 3 more cpu cores and more RAM memory. The Nokia 2 V Tella counts with a bit better display than Motorola Flipside, because it has a way higher resolution of 720 x 1440px, a much larger display and a much greater display density.
Nokia 2 V Tella counts with a greater camera than Motorola Flipside, because it has a much more mega-pixels back facing camera. The Nokia 2 V Tella features a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Flipside, because it has an external SD slot that supports up to 128 GB.
The Nokia 2 V Tella counts with a much better battery life than Motorola Flipside, because it has a 3000mAh battery size.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Nokia 2 V Tella is also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.