Search


Compare phones

Global Score
47.264.8
Basic Information
MotorolaNokia
Android 2.2, 2.1Android 9.0 Pie
2010-10-052019-06-10
4.31 x 2.26 x 0.59 inches6.01 x 2.83 x 0.37 inches
5.11 ounces5.50 ounces
--Black
--Metal and Plastic
--Scratch-Resistant Glass
$ 90.00$ 90.00
Display / Screen
3.1 inches5.5 inches
320 x 480 pixels 1440 x 720 pixels
TFTIPS LCD
186 pixels per inch293 pixels per inch
Capacitive, Multi-touchNo touch screen
6.87.3
Performance
TI OMAP3410 chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 429 SDM429 chipset
ARM Cortex-A8 (Single-Core 720 MHz) processorARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Quad-Core 2000 MHz) processor
512 MB RAM2 GB RAM
PowerVR SGX530 (200 MHz) GPUAdreno 504 GPU
7.28.73
Storage
--32 GB internal memory
microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slotmicroSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot
1.328.12
Camera
3.00 MP8.00 MP + 5.00 MP
--f/2.00 aperture
--1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution
5.068.47
Networks
Wi-FiWi-Fi
--Mobile Hotspot
HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSMLTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA
SIMNano SIM
3.56.1
Battery Life
1540mAh Li-Ion Battery2990mAh Battery
Removable BatteryNon-Removable Battery
288 hours standby time
7.3 hours talk time
--
3.364.96
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.1, EDRBluetooth 5.0
GPSGPS
Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity SensorAccelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor
FM RadioFM Radio

Comparison review

The Nokia 3.1 A is much better than the Motorola Flipside, getting a score of 64.8 against 47.2. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Nokia 3.1 A has newer 9.0 Pie version while Motorola Flipside has Android 2.2 version. Nokia 3.1 A's body is incredibly newer and incredibly thinner than the Motorola Flipside's, although it is a little heavier.

Nokia 3.1 A has a little sharper screen than Motorola Flipside, because it has a lot larger display, a lot higher resolution of 720 x 1440 pixels and a much greater pixels amount per inch of screen. The Nokia 3.1 A counts with a very superior memory for games and applications than Motorola Flipside, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 128 GB.

The Nokia 3.1 A has a very superior processing unit than Motorola Flipside, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with more RAM memory and 3 more cpu cores. The Nokia 3.1 A takes a lot better videos and photos than Motorola Flipside, because it has a camera in the back with a way higher 8 mega pixels resolution.

Nokia 3.1 A counts with a superior battery lifetime than Motorola Flipside, because it has a 2990mAh battery capacity.

The Nokia 3.1 A costs the same than the Motorola Flipside.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.