Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 47.2 | 50.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | ZTE |
| Android 2.2, 2.1 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2010-10-05 | 2018-03-30 |
| 4.31 x 2.26 x 0.59 inches | 5.73 x 2.83 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | -- |
| $ 90.00 | $ 80.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.1 inches | 5 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 854 x 480 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| 186 pixels per inch | 196 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.8 | 6.4 |
| Performance | |
| TI OMAP3410 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A8 (Single-Core 720 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A7, 32-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1100 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX530 (200 MHz) GPU | Adreno 304 GPU |
| 7.2 | 8.01 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 8 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 1.32 | 4.62 |
| Camera | |
| 3.00 MP | 5.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution |
| 5.06 | 6.05 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Micro SIM |
| 3.5 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1540mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2200mAh Micro SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 288 hours standby time 7.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.36 | 4.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
ZTE Tempo Go has a global score of 50.8, which is a little bit better than Motorola Flipside's 47.2 overall score. ZTE Tempo Go's design is incredibly newer, a lot thinner and a lot lighter than the Motorola Flipside. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but ZTE Tempo Go has a more recent 8.1 Oreo version while Motorola Flipside has Android 2.2 version.
ZTE Tempo Go counts with a greater processing power than Motorola Flipside, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with a higher number of cores and more RAM. The Motorola Flipside has just a bit better screen than ZTE Tempo Go, although it has a just a bit lower pixel quantity per inch of screen, a way smaller screen and a lot worse resolution of 480 x 320.
ZTE Tempo Go features a way bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Flipside. They have a SD memory slot that allows up to 32 GB. ZTE Tempo Go counts with a better camera than Motorola Flipside, because it has a camera with a much higher resolution. ZTE Tempo Go features a superior battery duration than Motorola Flipside, because it has a 2200mAh battery size.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we compare here, ZTE Tempo Go is also cheap compared to the Motorola Flipside, making buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.