Search


Compare phones

Samsung Champ

GT-C3300K, GT-C3300
Global Score
34.537.4
Basic Information
MotorolaSamsung
2010-07-302010-05-19
3.70 x 2.40 x 0.51 inches3.79 x 2.12 x 0.51 inches
3.70 ounces2.82 ounces
$ 100.00$ 90.00
Display / Screen
2.2 inches2.4 inches
220 x 176 pixels 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
128 pixels per inch167 pixels per inch
No touch screenResistive
5.56
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
--30,72 MB internal memory
microSD, microSDHC (up to 8 GB) external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 8 GB) external memory slot
0.761.16
Camera
1.30 MP1.30 MP
4.514.51
CDMAEDGE and GSM
--SIM
0.10.3
Battery Life
950mAh Li-Ion Battery1000mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
430 hours standby time
5.3 hours talk time
666 hours standby time
12 hours talk time
2.482.56
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.1Bluetooth 2.1, EDR
GPS--

Comparison review

Samsung Champ has a general score of 37.4, which is a bit better than the Motorola GRASP's general score of 34.5. Samsung Champ's design has the same thickness than the Motorola GRASP, but it's noticeably lighter. Samsung Champ has just a bit better looking display than Motorola GRASP, because it has a better resolution of 320 x 240px, a little bigger display and a better pixel quantity in each inch of display.

Samsung Champ features a much greater memory for games and applications than Motorola GRASP. They have an external SD slot that supports up to 8 GB. Samsung Champ has a processor that's just as good as Motorola GRASP's processing unit, they have 0 cores. Motorola GRASP and Samsung Champ both feature quite similar cameras, both have a camera with a 1.3 mega-pixels.

Samsung Champ has just a little better battery duration than Motorola GRASP, because it has a 5% larger battery size.

The Samsung Champ is not only the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheaper than the Motorola GRASP, making buying this phone a simple decision.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.