Search


Compare phones

Global Score
34.537.1
Basic Information
MotorolaSamsung
2010-07-302006-03-09
3.70 x 2.40 x 0.51 inches3.81 x 1.88 x 0.72 inches
3.70 ounces3.77 ounces
$ 100.00$ 80.00
Display / Screen
2.2 inches2 inches
220 x 176 pixels 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
128 pixels per inch200 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.56.3
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
--30,72 MB internal memory
microSD, microSDHC (up to 8 GB) external memory slotmicroSD external memory slot
0.760.4
Camera
1.30 MP2.00 MP
4.514.73
CDMAUMTS, EDGE and GSM
--SIM
0.10.4
Battery Life
950mAh Li-Ion Battery950mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
430 hours standby time
5.3 hours talk time
320 hours standby time
3.7 hours talk time
2.482.48
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.1Bluetooth 1.2
GPS--

Comparison review

Samsung SGH-Z400 is slightly better than the Motorola GRASP, with a general score of 37.1 against 34.5. Despite being the best we are comparing, we must highlight that it's also a notably older, a little heavier and extremely thicker phone. Samsung SGH-Z400 and Motorola GRASP feature really similar processing units, both of them have a 0-Core processing unit.

The Samsung SGH-Z400 counts with a more vivid screen than Motorola GRASP, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher pixel quantity per screen inch and a higher 320 x 240 pixels resolution. Motorola GRASP has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung SGH-Z400.

The Samsung SGH-Z400 shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Motorola GRASP, because it has a back facing camera with a much higher resolution. The Samsung SGH-Z400 counts with a battery lifetime that is just as good as Motorola GRASP's battery lifetime.

Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, the Samsung SGH-Z400 is also very cheap compared to the other ones, making it very easy to pick between these phones.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.