Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 45.4 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 1.5 | -- |
| 2010-03-22 | 2018-10-18 |
| 4.65 x 2.28 x 0.50 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.62 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 186 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive | No touch screen |
| 6.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Freescale Zeus 2.0 ARM1136 (Single-Core 500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 256 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.66 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 262,14 MB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 2.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 352 x 288 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.83 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 2.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1400mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 100 hours standby time 3.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.12 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL has an overall score of 80.7, which is much better than Motorola i1's 45.4 overall score. Even though the Google Pixel 3 XL is incredibly heavier than Motorola i1, it's noticeably thinner and incredibly newer. The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a much better screen than Motorola i1, because it has a much better 1440 x 2960 resolution, a much bigger screen and a much greater count of pixels per screen inch.
Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a way bigger memory for games and applications than Motorola i1, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage. The Google Pixel 3 XL features a much faster processing unit than Motorola i1, because it has more processing cores and 3,75 GB more RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 3 XL takes a lot better videos and photos than Motorola i1, because it has a much better 3840x2160 video resolution and a lot higher resolution back camera. The Google Pixel 3 XL features a way better battery life than Motorola i1, because it has 3430mAh of battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 3 XL not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.