Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 45.4 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 1.5 | -- |
| 2010-03-22 | 2019-03-15 |
| 4.65 x 2.28 x 0.50 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 4.62 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 186 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive | No touch screen |
| 6.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Freescale Zeus 2.0 ARM1136 (Single-Core 500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 256 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.66 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 262,14 MB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 2.12 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 352 x 288 (15 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.83 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 2.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1400mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 100 hours standby time 3.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.12 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a score of 83.8, which is much better than Motorola i1's 45.4 general score. The Samsung Galaxy A50 body is newer and noticeably thinner, but also notably heavier than Motorola i1. The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a much more vibrant display than Motorola i1, because it has much more pixels per display inch, a way higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a much bigger display.
The Galaxy A50 counts with a much more powerful CPU than Motorola i1, because it has a larger number of cores and a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy A50 has a greater camera than Motorola i1, because it has a back camera with much more megapixels and a way higher video resolution. The Galaxy A50 has a much better memory for games and applications than Motorola i1, because it has 127,74 GB more internal memory capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a superior battery lifetime than Motorola i1, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is a bit more expensive than the Motorola i1, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.