Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 27.9 | 27.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Cricket |
| -- | 2009-09-22 |
| 4.90 x 1.90 x 0.47 inches | 3.54 x 1.81 x 0.74 inches |
| 3.90 ounces | 2.82 ounces |
| $ 40.00 | $ 40.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 1.8 inches |
| 130 x 130 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| STN | TFT |
| 77 pixels per inch | 114 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 4.7 | 5.4 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| Camera | |
| -- | 0.30 MP |
| 0 | 3.63 |
| -- | CDMA |
| 0 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 920mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 120 hours standby time 2.8 hours talk time | 250 hours standby time 5 hours talk time |
| 2.24 | 2.48 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth |
| GPS | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola i425 is a bit better than the Cricket CAPTR, having a 27.9 score against 27.9. The Motorola i425 design is noticeably heavier but thinner than Cricket CAPTR. The Cricket CAPTR counts with a processing unit that is just as good as the Motorola i425 one, both have the same number of cores.
The Cricket CAPTR counts with a much better screen than Motorola i425, because it has more pixels per screen inch and a slightly higher resolution of 160 x 128px. Cricket CAPTR features a greater camera than Motorola i425. Motorola i425 and Cricket CAPTR both have quite similar storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos.
The Cricket CAPTR counts with greater battery duration than Motorola i425, because it has 920mAh of battery capacity instead of 800mAh.
The Motorola i425 costs exactly the same than Cricket CAPTR.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.