Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 35.9 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2009-06-23 | 2014-10-28 |
| 3.46 x 2.52 x 0.70 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 4.97 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| -- | Black and Blue |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 160 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 5.9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| -- | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 5.76 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 102,4 MB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 0.6 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 4.73 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 0.9 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1170mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 366 hours standby time 3.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Droid Turbo is much better than the Motorola Karma QA1, with a 76.4 score against 35.9. The Motorola Droid Turbo construction is newer and notably thinner, but somewhat heavier than Motorola Karma QA1. The Motorola Droid Turbo has a much sharper screen than Motorola Karma QA1, because it has a lot larger display, a lot higher pixels density and a much better 2560 x 1440 resolution.
Motorola Droid Turbo counts with much more storage for apps and games than Motorola Karma QA1, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 31,9 GB more internal memory. Motorola Droid Turbo features a much faster processor than Motorola Karma QA1, because it has more cpu cores and an additional graphics co-processor.
The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a much better battery duration than Motorola Karma QA1, because it has a 233 percent greater battery size. Motorola Droid Turbo features a way better camera than Motorola Karma QA1, because it has a lot more MP back-facing camera.
Motorola Droid Turbo and the Motorola Karma QA1 cost exactly the same, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.