Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 49.8 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 2.1 | -- |
| 2010-06-07 | 2018-03-16 |
| 4.56 x 2.40 x 0.43 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| -- | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 265 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| TI OMAP3430 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A8 (Single-Core 720 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 256 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX530 (200 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 7.11 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 262,14 MB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 2.12 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (17 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 720 x 480 (24 fps) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.71 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1390mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 320 hours standby time 9 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.12 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 is way better than the Motorola Milestone XT720, getting an 83.3 score against 49.8. Galaxy S9's construction is a lot newer and a lot thinner than the Motorola Milestone XT720's, although it is also a little heavier. Samsung Galaxy S9 features a brighter screen than Motorola Milestone XT720, because it has a really larger display, a much better resolution of 1440 x 2960 and a way higher display pixel density.
The Galaxy S9 has an extremely better CPU than Motorola Milestone XT720, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with more cpu cores and 3,75 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy S9 has a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola Milestone XT720, because it has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 400 GB and 64 GB internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S9 features a way better battery lifetime than Motorola Milestone XT720, because it has a 116 percent more battery size. The Samsung Galaxy S9 features a lot better camera than Motorola Milestone XT720, because it has a back camera with a way higher 12 mega pixels resolution and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S9 costs a bit more money than the Motorola Milestone XT720, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.