Compare phones
Motorola Moto E (2015)
XT1524XT1524
Motorola DROID Turbo
64 GB| Global Score | |
| 63.5 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2015-02-25 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.11 x 2.63 x 0.48 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and Blue |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 140.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 245 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.5 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 8916 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A53 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 306 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 4.62 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2390mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.32 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo has an overall score of 77.9, which is way better than Moto E (2015)'s score of 63.5. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but the Motorola DROID Turbo has the older 4.4.4 version and Moto E (2015) has Android 5.0 version. Motorola DROID Turbo's construction is just a little thinner but heavier than the Moto E (2015), and both were released with only a few months difference.
The Motorola DROID Turbo features a much sharper display than Moto E (2015), because it has a bigger display, a way higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a way greater pixels density. Motorola DROID Turbo has a bit better performance than Motorola Moto E (2015), because although it has a 32-bit CPU against 64-bits, and they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a better GPU running at 500 MHz and more RAM.
Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Moto E (2015), because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 56 GB more internal storage. Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a really longer battery duration than Motorola Moto E (2015), because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity instead of 2390mAh.
The Motorola DROID Turbo shoots greater photographs and videos than Moto E (2015), because it has a larger aperture for better captures in low light situations, a way more megapixels back camera and a lot higher video resolution.
Motorola DROID Turbo is not only the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.