Compare phones
Motorola Moto E (2015)
XT1527XT1527
Amazon Fire Phone
32 GB| Global Score | |
| 63.5 | 69.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Amazon |
| Android 5.0 | Android 4.2.2 |
| 2015-02-25 | 2014-06-18 |
| 5.11 x 2.63 x 0.48 inches | 5.50 x 2.60 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.64 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Purple, Red and Yellow |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 290.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 245 pixels per inch | 312 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.5 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 8916 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 8974 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A53 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 306 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 4.62 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.7 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 6.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2390mAh Battery | 2400mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 285 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 4.32 | 4.4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 3.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Amazon Fire Phone is a little bit better than Moto E (2015), with a 69.6 score against 63.5. These phones have Android OS, but the Amazon Fire Phone has the older 4.2.2 version while Moto E (2015) has Android 5.0. The Amazon Fire Phone body is a bit heavier but incredibly thinner than the Moto E (2015), and both of them were only released with a couple of months difference.
The Amazon Fire Phone features a little better processing power than Moto E (2015), because although it has a 32-bit processor against 64-bits, and they both have a 450 megahertz GPU and 4 cpu cores, the Amazon Fire Phone also counts with more RAM memory. Amazon Fire Phone has a much better looking display than Moto E (2015), because it has a higher quantity of pixels per inch of screen, a little bigger display and a better 1280 x 720 pixels resolution.
The Amazon Fire Phone features a superior camera than Motorola Moto E (2015), because it has a lot higher 1920x1080 video resolution, a lot more MP back-facing camera and a larger camera aperture to take better low light photography and video. Amazon Fire Phone counts with much more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto E (2015), because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 32 GB internal memory.
The Amazon Fire Phone has just a bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto E (2015), because it has 2400mAh of battery capacity instead of 2390mAh.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Amazon Fire Phone is also very cheap compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.