Compare phones
Motorola Moto E
Dual Sim| Global Score | |
| 56.9 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 4.4.4, 4.4.3, 4.4.2 | Android 10 |
| 2014-05-13 | 2018-10-18 |
| 4.91 x 2.55 x 0.48 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.01 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | P-OLED |
| 256 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 8210 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 302 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.1 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 5.5 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1980mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ is much better than Motorola Moto E, getting an 81.2 score against 56.9. The LG V40 ThinQ body is noticeably newer and noticeably thinner, but also somewhat heavier than Motorola Moto E. Both phones in this review use Android OS (Operating System), but LG V40 ThinQ has older 10 version and Motorola Moto E has Android 4.4.4 version.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a more powerful processor than Motorola Moto E, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with more CPU cores and more RAM memory. LG V40 ThinQ features a much better display than Moto E, because it has a much better resolution of 1440 x 3120px, a lot bigger display and a much better pixel number per display inch.
The LG V40 ThinQ shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Moto E, because it has a way more mega pixels back camera. The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a way bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto E, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and 60 GB more internal storage.
LG V40 ThinQ features a very superior battery lifetime than Moto E, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 1980mAh.
The LG V40 ThinQ costs a bit more money than the Moto E, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.