Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 56.9 | 71.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4, 4.4.3, 4.4.2 | Android 4.0 |
| 2014-05-13 | 0000-00-00 |
| 4.91 x 2.55 x 0.48 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.01 ounces | 4.72 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 105.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 256 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 8210 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 302 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.1 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| -- | f/2.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 5.5 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| Micro SIM | Micro SIM |
| 4.7 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1980mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 3.92 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket has a score of 71.5, which is a lot better than the Moto E's 56.9 score. The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket is a noticeably thinner and a bit lighter cellphone than Moto E. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket has older 4.0 version while Moto E has Android 4.4.4 version.
Galaxy S III Cricket features just a bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto E, because it has a quite bigger screen, a higher 1280 x 720 resolution and a little greater pixels count per screen inch. The Galaxy S III Cricket counts with just a little better processing power than Moto E, and although they both have 2 cores and a 400 MHz GPU, the Galaxy S III Cricket also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S III Cricket shoots much better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto E, because it has a camera with a way better 8 mega-pixels resolution. The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket has a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto E, because it has an external SD slot that supports up to 64 GB and 32 GB internal storage.
Galaxy S III Cricket features a little better battery performance than Motorola Moto E, because it has 2100mAh of battery capacity against 1980mAh.
Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket is not only the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.