Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 66.5 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2017-06-22 | 2017-10-19 |
| 5.69 x 2.83 x 0.37 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Black, Blue and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 130.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 8920 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 308 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 is way better than Motorola Moto E4, getting a general score of 81.6 against 66.5. Even though the Google Pixel 2 and the Motorola Moto E4 were released with only a couple months difference, the Google Pixel 2 is a little bit lighter and thinner. The Google Pixel 2 has a superior CPU than Moto E4, because it has more CPU cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 2 counts with a sharper display than Moto E4, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Google Pixel 2 also has a much higher 1080 x 1920 resolution and a better count of pixels per inch of screen. The Google Pixel 2 has a much bigger memory to store more apps and games than Moto E4, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Moto E4 counts with a little longer battery duration than Google Pixel 2, because it has 2800mAh of battery capacity instead of 2700mAh. Google Pixel 2 takes much clearer photographs and videos than Moto E4, because it has a lot better 3840x2160 video definition, a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution and a bigger aperture to capture better captures and video in poorly lited environments.
The Google Pixel 2 is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheaper than the other phone, making this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.