| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2021-10-11 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| -- | 6.63 ounces |
| Carbon Gray and Pink Clay | Black and Gold |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T700 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Octa-Core 1800 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Galaxy C9 Pro has a global score of 81, which is better than Moto E40's global score of 71.8. Both phones in this review include Android operating system, but Galaxy C9 Pro has newer 6.0 Marshmallow version while Moto E40 has Android 11 version, so it offers some extra features. Galaxy C9 Pro has a little bit better hardware performance than Moto E40, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy C9 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a bit more vivid display than Moto E40, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1080 x 1920 resolution and a higher pixels count in each display inch. The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a much greater memory to install games and applications than Motorola Moto E40, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 256 GB.
The Motorola Moto E40 and the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro have extremely similar cameras, because although the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a much less mega-pixels back camera, it also counts with a larger aperture for better low light captures. The Moto E40 counts with superior battery lifetime than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery capacity.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.