Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-10-11 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| -- | 7.73 ounces |
| Carbon Gray and Pink Clay | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T700 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 1800 MHz processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is slightly better than the Moto E40, having a overall score of 77.8 against 71.8. Both phones we are comparing here include Android OS (Operating System), but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has newer 14 version and Moto E40 has Android 11 version. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much sharper display than Moto E40, because it has a bigger display, a lot higher screen pixels density and a lot higher 2200 x 2480 resolution.
Motorola Moto E40 has a much greater hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes much better photos and videos than Moto E40, because it has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light captures and videos and a camera with a better 50 mega-pixels resolution.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto E40, because it has 512 GB internal storage. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with just a bit better battery life than Motorola Moto E40, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.