Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 66 | 71.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 4.0 |
| 2018-05-01 | 0000-00-00 |
| 6.12 x 2.84 x 0.35 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 4.72 ounces |
| Gray | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 120.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 1440 x 720 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 308 GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.28 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.60 aperture |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.1 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket is a little bit better than Motorola Moto E5, with a 71.5 score against 66. Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket's design is lighter and just a little thinner than the Motorola Moto E5. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket has an older 4.0 version and Motorola Moto E5 has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Galaxy S III Cricket counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Moto E5, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have 2 GB of RAM memory, the Galaxy S III Cricket also counts with a graphics co-processor. The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket features a better looking screen than Motorola Moto E5, because although it has a little bit worse 1280 x 720 resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit greater pixels count in each inch in the display.
Galaxy S III Cricket counts with just a bit better camera than Moto E5, because although it has a much tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low light photography and video, and they both have the same video frame rate, the same 1920x1080 video quality and a 8 megapixels resolution back-facing camera, the Galaxy S III Cricket also counts with a lot larger sensor providing a much higher image quality.
The Galaxy S III Cricket counts with more memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto E5, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows 64 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Motorola Moto E5 counts with a really longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket, because it has a 90% bigger battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.