Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-05 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.13 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.28 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Bright cherry and Polished graphite | Aurora black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a general score of 83.7, which is better than the Moto E6 Plus's 73.4 score. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but the LG V50 ThinQ has older 10 version and Moto E6 Plus has Android 9.0 Pie version. Even though the LG V50 ThinQ and the Moto E6 Plus were only released 4 months apart, the LG V50 ThinQ construction is just a little thinner but also somewhat heavier.
LG V50 ThinQ has a bit faster processing unit than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V50 ThinQ also has more RAM memory. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a lot better looking display than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because it has a lot better 1440 x 3120px resolution, a little bit larger screen and a much greater pixels count per inch of screen.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a better camera than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because although it has a lesser MP back-facing camera, it also counts with a way larger camera aperture to take better low-light photos and video, a larger back camera sensor providing a better image quality and a lot higher video quality.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much bigger memory to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. LG V50 ThinQ has better battery performance than Moto E6 Plus, because it has a 33% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.