Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-05 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.13 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.28 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Bright cherry and Polished graphite | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 282 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is a lot better than Moto E6 Plus, having a general score of 91.8 against 73.4. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has older 11 version while Moto E6 Plus has Android 9.0 Pie. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G's construction is newer and just a little thinner, but heavier than Moto E6 Plus.
Galaxy A71 5G counts with a brighter screen than Moto E6 Plus, because it has a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2400, a higher display density and a quite bigger display. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Moto E6 Plus, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and a SD extension slot that allows up to 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A71 5G features a very superior battery life than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The Galaxy A71 5G takes way better videos and photos than Moto E6 Plus, because it has a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution, a much better (4K) video quality, a lot larger sensor taking lot better quality videos and photos and a bigger aperture to take better low light photos and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.